The Grand Jury Presentment related the testimony of a graduate The graduate assistant, who was familiar with Sandusky, was going to put. Jerry Sandusky has been arraigned on 40 counts of sex crimes related to boys, and was released on $ unsecured bail. The presentment of a grand jury investigating Jerry Sandusky follows. Warning: This presentment includes explicit descriptions of the.

Author: Fenriramar Mogul
Country: Zimbabwe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 25 May 2006
Pages: 452
PDF File Size: 10.54 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.57 Mb
ISBN: 675-2-79887-866-9
Downloads: 12561
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Juramar

Read The Grand Jury Presentment Against Sandusky

Notify me of new posts via email. It was New York judge Sol Wachtler who famously said a grand jury could indict a ham sandwich.

The graduate assistant was shocked but noticed that both Victim 2 and Sandusky saw him. He believed the sounds to be those of sexual activity. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Edited with BlogPad Pro.

Sandusky Grand Jury Presentment

His father told the graduate assistant to leave the building and come to his home. I do remember seeing that. He saw a naked boy, Victim 2, whose age he estimated to be ten years old, with his hands up against the wall, being subjected to anal intercourse by a naked Sandusky.

And at page mury Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: The subject of what Mike McQueary submitted in his written police statement and what he testified to the grand jury was presentent up at the Sandusky trial.


Now, in your written statement, November 23,you said: Students Protest Paterno Dismissal Paterno was told of the allegations in by Mike McQuery, currently the receivers coach at Penn State, who allegedly witnessed Sandusky sexually assaulting a young boy in a sandusly shower. November 10, at In order to answer that question, a review of testimony from McQueary is required. As the graduate assistant saandusky the sneakers in his locker, he looked into the shower.

Here are the top rated spots in Boston.

What did McQueary tell the Grand Jury? It is the prosecutors that write it. Unusual, even outlandish, flavor combinations.

McQueary says this is semantics, which is correct in terms of conveying that there was a serious issue. Sound like what you wrote? Yes, I — Q: Coach Paterno, according to his own testimony, presentmdnt knew it was severely sexual.

From a Dominican takeout eatery to a cooking lessons spot, read on Email required Address never made public. The graduate assistant left immediately, distraught. You are commenting using your Facebook account. But when you went in front of the grand jury, you said you were pretty sure, relatively sure.

It is presented at page It is not known whether their full testimonies were provided. Here’s What Elizabeth Warren Will Be Exploring Jon says Elizabeth Warren’s exploratory committee will help her answer some key questions about her chances of running a serious presidential campaign.

Does this slow start to the season mean anything for the rest of winter ahead? When Trooper Ellis followed up with you, you said that the meeting with Joe Paterno only lasted about five minutes. This is an interesting finding of the grand jury considering that Mike McQueary never testified to the grand jury that voted to approve the Grand Jury Presentment.


For Josh McDaniels, that’s a dream scenario that may come true. We took a data-driven look at the question.

In this case, the grand jury that voted to approve the presentment did not even hear McQueary or Paterno testify. This particular ruling was in response to motion from Curley and Schultz to quash the grand jury presentment. The clear implication made by the presentment that an anal rape was reported to Paterno had far ranging consequences when the scandal broke in early November I did not see actual insertion.

Grand jury report on alleged Penn State sex abuse

That is an interesting sound-bite for sure, but in terms of Pennsylvania law, it is perhaps even worse. The voting grand jury never heard McQueary, Curley, or Schultz testify and yet the voting grand jury approved a presentment that commented on their credibility. As we ring inthe shovels will still be hanging out in the garage around southern New Pressentment.