LA Rivoluzione Dimenticata (Italian Edition) [Lucio Russo] on * FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Get Instant Access to La Rivoluzione Dimenticata. Il Pensiero Pensiero Scientifico Greco E La Scienza Moderna By Lucio Russo pdf. La Rivoluzione. Lucio Russo (born 22 November ) is an Italian physicist, mathematician and historian of Born in BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn (Italian: La rivoluzione dimenticata), Russo promotes the belief that Hellenistic science in the period.
|Published (Last):||3 February 2005|
|PDF File Size:||20.35 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Views Read Edit View history. Lucio Dimenticatq born 22 November is an Italian physicistmathematician and historian of science.
This page was last edited on 5 Septemberat Il pensiero scientifico greco e la scienza moderna. Not in the Classical period. Indeed—crucially—the works of Archimedes meant to ancient readers something different from what they meant to, say, Galileo.
He ar- gues that all the components rivoluzionne this method were put in place in the Hellenistic world: Russo bases his argument on an interpretation of the scientific method. Briefly, I find his dismissal of non-Hellenistic science unmotivated. Somehow, a process of forgetting must have occurred in between. Archimedes was not, and his works meant, to ancient readers, something different from what they would mean if written today. Click here to sign up.
Some structure might, and therefore should, rivoouzione discerned in it. Indeed, Russo cannot be much wrong in ascribing a major role, rivoluzion this play, to the Greeks. Third and finally, whatever we may think of the narrative Russo offers for the entire his- tory of Western science, I feel we ought to applaud him for offering it.
In fact, so Russo claims with great persuasive vigor, we have forgotten the true time and place this revolution took place.
First, it belongs to a new wave of studies of Greek mathematics, where emphasis oucio from the Classical antecedents to the Hellenistic ex- tant sources themselves.
La Rivoluzione Dimenticata
La rivoluzione dimenticataRusso promotes the belief that Hellenistic science in the period — BC reached heights not achieved by Classical age science, and proposes that it went further than ordinarily thought, in multiple fields not normally associated with ancient science.
In The Forgotten Revolution: Hardly forgotten, readers might say. Wikiquote has quotations related to: We may often be wary today, as professional historians, of suggesting all-encompassing models of historical progress and decline. Nor later than the third century B. He engaged in mass purges and tusso of all intellectuals. Retrieved from ” https: Third and finally, I think Russo puts too much stress on a single historical model.
La rivoluzione dimenticata. Il pensiero scientifico greco e la scienza moderna
Skip to main content. Mathematical reconstructions out, textual studies in: First, I think Russo puts too much stress on a single period.
From Roman times right through the 17th cen- tury, throughout the history of Mediterranean and European civilizations, to do science was to study Greeks. It will serve as excellent reading in a survey of the history of science, besides of course offering an important thesis, well worth our critical attention. The same principle holds for intellectual achievements, yet Russo to exaggerate a little reads Archimedes almost as if he was the contemporary dienticata Popper.
Preface by Marcello Cini. Log In Sign Up.
La Rivoluzione Dimenticata by Lucio Russo
Zur Geschichte epistemischer Dinge. Yet the play of the history of Western science was risso entirely episodic. Among his main areas of interest are Gibbs measure of the Ising modelpercolation theory and finite Bernoulli schemes, within which he proved an approximate version of the classical Kolmogorov’s zero—one law.
Perhaps, then, the scientific revolution consisted just in this: Lucio Russo in A truly forgotten revolution! Remember me on this computer. Second, I think Russo puts too much dimenticzta on a single method. As this shift gets us from speculation into facts, it is of obvious methodological value.
This was not West- ern Europe of the 16th—17th centuries, but the eastern Mediterranean of the third century B. While something profound clearly changed roughly between the fifth and the fourth centuries B. Help Center Find new research papers in: